MolecuLight imaging is an important tool to help clinicians guide debridement and remove biofilm in venous leg ulcers (VLUs)
Repeated fluorescence imaging and targeted fluorescent-guided debridement (MolecuLight) was useful for managing bacterial bioburden to support wound healing
Real-time fluorescence imaging (MolecuLight) provides a novel and effective method along with the standard of care for managing osSSI after kidney transplantation
Fluorescence imaging of wound bacterial location & load changes treatment plans in 56% - 73% of wounds
MolecuLight significantly improved the detection of high bacterial load in each group of skin tones, peaking in the high group at 12-fold over CSS alone
MolecuLight is poised to provide a more objective and equitable indicator of wound bacteria
Effective strategies include those that raise awareness of antibiotic overprescribing and those that enhance diagnosis of infection, such as fluorescence imaging (MolecuLight)
MolecuLight i:X helpful targeting for bacterial cultures as well as in judging therapeutic necessity for intractable skin ulcers.
Fluorescence imaging using MolecuLight provides a more accurate and relevant microbiological profile that guides optimal wound sampling compared to clinical judgment
MolecuLight Improved Sensitivity 8.3-Fold for Detecting Bacterial Burden in DFUs over CSS alone
Fluorescence imaging showed that 84.2% of DFUs contained high bacterial loads in the periwound
Authors introduce new terminology, chronic inhibitory bacterial load (CIBL)
MolecuLight successfully used to detect location & load of elevated bacterial load prior to delivery of non-thermal gas plasma in DFU patients
Quick detection of elevated bacterial burden enabled instant implementation of wound hygiene, skin disinfection, appropriate dressing choice and curative treatment was possible
High diagnostic accuracy to detect elevated bacterial loads in perineal wounds
The sensitivity was 83%, specificity was 90%, and the PPV was 92%
In 33.3% of patients prescribed systemic antibiotics, no CSS were present. Prescribing patterns did not correlate with bacterial load
Reliance on CSS to diagnose clinically significant bacterial burden in chronic wounds leads to the haphazard use of antimicrobials
Improved methods of identifying bacterial burden and infection (e.g. MolecuLight) are needed to enhance antimicrobial stewardship efforts in wound care
The use of MolecuLight to identify elevated bacterial loads in venous leg ulcers was confirmed and validated by pathology
Effectiveness of Alprep Pad® for cleaning and debridement of DFUs was studied
MolecuLight i:X was used to establish the presence of bioburden in the wound bed, wound edge and periwound skin
Wound size was measured using the MolecuLight device
First RCT using MolecuLight i:X technology
Addition of MolecuLight to standard treatment doubled 12-week healing rates of DFUs (204%) and improved wound closure
Fluorescence imaging aids antimicrobial stewardship by supporting evidence-based decision-making at the point of care
Also increased communication, enhanced efficiency, and improved continuity of care between wound care providers and hospital sites
Fluorescence imaging can help the specialist in a more targeted assessment and management of infection
Fluorescent imaging excluded infection at the initial visit, and debridement was avoided
MolecuLight-assisted assessment of wound bacterial burden was helpful point-of-care tool in the clinician's armamentarium to diagnose pyoderma gangrenosum accurately
pH values on wound bed confirm non-invasive correlation between fluorescence & bacterial burden
MolecuLight i:X is able to objectively detect the bacterial proliferation in chronic wounds
MolecuLight also guides the correct assessment in the absence of clinical signs of infection and the presence of subclinical bacteria burden
MolecuLight used in clinical trial of sodium hypochlorite to test its efficacy in reducing bacterial burden and promoting healing
Used to assess the presence of elevated burden in patients pre- and post-treatment
Initial findings: Sodium hypochlorite is efficacious in reducing bacterial burden and promoting healing
Clinical signs and symptoms (CSS) assessment has poor sensitivity (6.8%) for detecting high bacterial loads in surgical wounds
Point-of-care fluorescence imaging for high bacterial loads improved sensitivity by 5.7-fold compared with CSS alone
Advanced image interpretation training, including hands-on experience, further increases sensitivity of fluorescence imaging up to 11.3-fold vs. CSS alone
Reliance on CSS to diagnose clinically significant bacterial burden in chronic wounds leads to the haphazard use of antimicrobials
Improved methods of identifying bacterial burden and infection are needed to enhance antimicrobial stewardship efforts in wound care
MolecuLight i:X can provide utility in point-of-care detection of elevated bacterial burden
Early awareness and management of bacterial burden & biofilm is essential to wound healing
Tissue biopsy & quantitative culture aren’t widely practiced and semi-quantitative analysis is unreliable
MolecuLight fluorescence imaging offers great potential to detect elevated bacterial burden in wounds
Delphi method was employed to establish consensus guidelines describing fluorescence imaging (MolecuLight i:X) use
96% reported that imaging-informed treatment plans led to improved wound healing
Guidelines provided will help to standardize use of fluorescence imaging among wound care providers
Using novel debridement tool, fluorescence imaging demonstrated a reduction in bacterial load in 69% of cases, with complete resolution in 19% of wounds.
Advantage of utilizing point-of-care fluorescence imaging for improving bacterial detection and optimizing treatment strategies with wound sepsis in stage 4 pelvic pressure injuries.
MolecuLight i:X recommended, as review of NICE guidance in new JoWC publication "Wound healing: what is the NICE guidance from the UK?" for the assessment of fluorescent bacteria in wounds.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a common bacterial pathogen in chronic wounds, is challenging to detect by standard assessment of clinical signs and symptoms
Cyan detected on MolecuLight i:X fluorescence images, can be used to reliably predict Pseudomonas aeruginosa at the point-of-care, with a PPV of 93% (confirmed by microbiological analysis)
In this prospective trial, addition of a biofilm disrupting antimicrobial agent to NPWT reduced surface area and led to improved wound healing in 4/6 recalcitrant pressure ulcers
A reduction in wound area correlated with a reduction in bacterial burden as evidenced by fluorescence imaging (MolecuLight i:X)
The MolecuLight procedure enabled detection of bacteria build up in the NPWT sponges at the point-of-care
This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a porcine peritoneum-derived matrix, a type of cellular and/or tissue product for treatment of DFUs
MolecuLight i:X imaging and measurement of bacterial protease activity (BPA) were performed weekly to evaluate bacterial load in wounds
Low bacterial loads, indicated by absence of fluorescence on MolecuLight i:X images and negative BPA, predicted wound healing
Fluorescence imaging was used to inform on the presence of bacterial loads in stage 3 and 4 pressure ulcers
These pressure ulcers underwent NPWT and treatment with a biofilm disrupting agent
In wounds where negative fluorescence images suggested lower bacterial levels, a reduction in wound surface area and volume was observed
Fluorescence imaging was used to meet Joint Commission guidelines for an antimicrobial stewardship program
Combined with clinical examination of signs and symptoms of infection, the MolecuLight imaging procedure improves the clinician’s ability to diagnose infection
Antimicrobial stewardship will soon become part of standard wound center reporting
23% increase in 12 week wound healing rate
33% decrease in antibiotic prescribing
47% decrease in antimicrobial spending per wound
UPPER and LOWER CSS checklists were developed to distinguish between local & systemic infection
Addition of fluorescence imaging led to more judicious application of antimicrobials & more thorough wound bed preparation
95% sensitivity when fluorescence imaging was added over signs and symptoms alone (p<0.01)
This RCT used fluorescence imaging to evaluate the effects of cold atmospheric plasma on wound area of chronic wounds
Fluorescence images were used to visualize the bacterially colonized area and compare the area before and after
50.4 % reduction of bacterial load for Group 1 and 35.0 % for Group 2 compared to the day of study
69% of wounds had changes in treatment plans due to using the MolecuLight i:X
85% of wounds with wound bed preparation & high bacterial burden (>104 CFU/g) were impacted by information provided by the i:X
53% of wounds involving antimicrobial stewardship & high bacterial burden (>104 CFU/g) were impacted by information provided by the i:X
25% decrease in wound area over 4 weeks with the elimination of bacterial fluorescence from wounds
A positive healing trajectory was associated with the implementation of fluorescence imaging (i:X)
All wounds where fluorescence signal from bacteria was eradicated healed within 2-6 weeks
24% of VLU periwound area was colonized by high bacterial loads pre-debridement
99% reduction of bacterial signal in the wound bed after debridement using fluorescence guidance
36% of periwound bacterial signal is left behind after standard debridement in VLUs (without
the guidance of fluorescence)
The Fluorescence imaging procedure was used to inform advanced wound therapies
Three cases are described in which fluorescence images provided information at the point-of-care
This information was used to guide use of antibiofilm agents, NPWT, and preparation of the wound bed for grafting
In a clinical trial with 412 punch biopsies, only one resulted in an adverse event (abscess)
Fluorescence images revealed presence of bacteria at site of biopsy prior to abscess development
Bacterial load was confirmed as 106 CFU/g from the biopsy
This case series describes the utility of fluorescence imaging for detection of bacterial burden in an adult burn center
Fluorescence imaging informed decision making on dressings, antimicrobials and antibiotics used at point of care
Swabs confirmed accuracy of imaging results (positive or negative) in all 10 cases
>95% measurement accuracy of MolecuLight i:X device for wound area, length and width
89% of wounds with red or cyan fluorescence in the periwound, a region rarely sampled
85% of DFUs where additional debridement was performed based on fluorescence guidance
Fluorescence imaging was more accurate than clinical judgement in detecting elevated bacterial loads
$7,660 USD per patient was the estimated cost savings from using fluorescence imaging information
This information avoided the application of cellular tissue products on wounds with high levels of bacteria
Fluorescence imaging was used to monitor elevated bacterial loads during burn reconstruction
Weekly fluorescence imaging led to detection of elevated bacterial loads in the dermal template at the point-of-care
This resulted in debridement
9/10 wound care patients more appropriately triaged with fluorescence information
60% of these 9 patients would have been undertreated while 30% of patients were being overtreated
$1552 Single patient cost savings (USD) due to fluorescence evidence-based treatment plan changes
Wounds were assessed for CSS & fluorescence images were then acquired to determine presence of moderate-to-heavy bacterial loads
Sensitivity of fluorescence imaging was 3-fold higher than CSS (72% vs 22%; p=0.002)
Fluorescence imaging information resulted in treatment plan modifications in 73% of study wounds
95% Sensitivity for detecting bacteria in fluorescence images
95% Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of fluorescence images
100% Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of fluorescence images
This peer-reviewed tutorial describes how to interpret the various fluorescence signals detected from wound tissues and bacteria using the fluorescence imaging procedure
Methods to minimize imaging artifacts and misinterpretation are described
Fluorescence images provided the clinician with a “map” to inform wound sampling, cleaning, and location of surgical debridement
Heavy bacterial load was confirmed by microbiology methods in all wounds exhibiting red fluorescence
Fluorescence images identified asymptomatic patients and highlighted areas of clinical concern that otherwise would have been overlooked
The PPV of red fluorescence on MolecuLight i:X images was 100%, regardless of sampling method, analysis technique, or study site
Fluorescence guidance, in combination with subsurface sampling techniques, could eliminate the risk of false negative wound sampling
Fluorescence imaging information could influence treatment decisions at the point of care
Fluorescence imaging of diabetic foot ulcers had superior accuracy (78%) in detecting the presence of clinically significant bacteria than standard practice (Levine swabbing, 52%; p=0.048)
Higher bacterial loads were detected from wound regions positive for bacterial fluorescence compared to regions sampled based on CSS alone